NetShrine Discussion Forum  

Go Back   NetShrine Discussion Forum > NDF Archives > NDF's 2nd Year - 2002 > 2002 Baseball History Archives
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 10-29-2002, 08:52 AM   #1
pwdennis
NetShrine All-Century Team
 
pwdennis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Winter Springs, FL
Posts: 2,503
Default AL Remains dominant in World Series play

The Anaheim victory in the 2002 World Series gives the AL a 58-40 edge in World Series championship rings

BY Decade
1903-1909 AL 2 NL 4
1910-1919 AL 8 NL 2
1920-1929 AL 6 NL 4
1930-1939 AL 7 NL 3
1940-1949 AL 6 NL 4
1950-1959 AL 6 NL 4
1960-1969 AL 4 NL 6
1970-1979 AL 6 NL 4
1980-1989 AL 5 NL 5
1990-1999 AL 6 NL 3
2000-2002 AL 2 NL 1

As you will note the AL dominance begins before the first Yankee championship and runs through to today.

In the post-expansion era (1961-2002) the AL leads 23-18
In the post-integration era (1947-2002) the AL leads 32-23
__________________
"I would submit that if the world survives for a million years, perhaps its finest hour may be that in the last half of the 20th century, when the power to blow up the world rested in the hands of a few men in two very unsophisticated and suspicious countries, we didn't do it, and one American, Richard Nixon, moved the cold war away from permanent confrontation toward victory. How could any wrong that he did compare with that?" - John Sears

Last edited by pwdennis : 10-29-2002 at 08:56 AM.
pwdennis is offline  
Old 10-29-2002, 08:56 AM   #2
CpUltravox
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'm not sure what that proves, but I like it!

And hopefully it lays to rest this ridiculous notion that AL teams are at a disadvantage in Series play because of the No-DH rule, unless you believe that the AL should rightfully hold a 65-33 advantage or something (which I may - not sure yet ).
 
Old 10-29-2002, 09:28 AM   #3
WiredTiger
Guest
 
WiredTiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: The city of Kaline, Cobb and Greenberg
Posts: 3,395
Default

I think it proves that the Yankees are in the AL.
WiredTiger is offline  
Old 10-29-2002, 09:29 AM   #4
Skip
NetShrine Vagabond
 
Skip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Louisville
Posts: 7,866
Default

Other than some sort of lame-o comment like "Take away the NYY and the Cardinals and both leagues are about dead even," I can't come up with any justification or rationalization. Help out you NL fans!!

Of course this really is going to de-volve into another discussion on all things Yankee.
Skip is offline  
Old 10-29-2002, 09:36 AM   #5
CpUltravox
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Aw - skip - I was trying to devolve it into a conversation about the DH, not the NY's!

I would have to check stats on this - but assuming the average AL pitcher creates 0 runs over the 10-12 at bats that they have in a 4 game series - how many runs does the average NL pitcher create over 10-12 at bats? My guess is that it's so minimal as to be almost zero.

I don't think there's a reason that the AL is winning more. Better organizations overall would be my guess.
 
Old 10-29-2002, 09:45 AM   #6
JamesI
Netshrine Vacuum Cleaner
 
JamesI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Potsdam, N.Y.
Posts: 3,723
Send a message via ICQ to JamesI Send a message via Yahoo to JamesI
Default

I don't think the DH is a huge factor in the average series. Most NL teams have someone who can hit a little to play DH, and on most good AL teams the DH is not one of their best hitters or can at least play 1b or corner outfield.

What your stats say to me is Yankees are AL.
JamesI is offline  
Old 10-29-2002, 09:49 AM   #7
sweaver
Netshrine Cleanup Hitter
 
sweaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Mountain State
Posts: 8,883
Send a message via AIM to sweaver Send a message via Yahoo to sweaver
Default

This year, having the DH in the AL park was a bigger problem for the NL, because the Giants had exactly NO bats to put in that spot. And lost 3 of 4 in Anaheim, at least partly because of that.

On the larger level? Well, the DH has only been used in the Series periodically since 1976, so I don't think that's it. It's just the most successful franchise in history is in the AL.
sweaver is offline  
Old 10-29-2002, 10:12 AM   #8
rcartman28
NetShrine All-Century Team
 
rcartman28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hudson, WI
Posts: 1,408
Send a message via Yahoo to rcartman28
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by WiredTiger
I think it proves that the Yankees are in the AL.


Uh, yeah....my thoughts, too.
__________________
I would have looked out for the water main. But that's just me.....

Brett Favre
rcartman28 is offline  
Old 10-29-2002, 10:22 AM   #9
CpUltravox
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I disagree on the Yankees thing. I know they've been there a lot - BUT - once you make it to the series, really it's a 50/50 shot, no?

I guess what I mean is - if the Yankees have 40 AL championships (I don't know the exact number) - that's a tribute to their organizational strength.

But once you get to a short series, the dominance SHOULD be muted, no?
 
Old 10-29-2002, 11:03 AM   #10
SmedIndy
NetShrine's Historian
 
SmedIndy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Zionsville, IN
Posts: 10,569
Send a message via AIM to SmedIndy
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by CpUltravox
But once you get to a short series, the dominance SHOULD be muted, no?


The Yankees had by far the best teams in baseball in those eras. It probably wasn't a straight 50--50 shot for the NL to beat them because the talent wasn't to the Yankees' level.
SmedIndy is offline  
Old 10-29-2002, 11:23 AM   #11
pwdennis
NetShrine All-Century Team
 
pwdennis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Winter Springs, FL
Posts: 2,503
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by SmedIndy
The Yankees had by far the best teams in baseball in those eras. It probably wasn't a straight 50--50 shot for the NL to beat them because the talent wasn't to the Yankees' level.


Agreed - often the second best team in baseball finished second to the Yankees in the AL

It should be noted that the Yankees are 26-12 in the World Series, meaning that the rest of the AL is 32-28 against the NL
__________________
"I would submit that if the world survives for a million years, perhaps its finest hour may be that in the last half of the 20th century, when the power to blow up the world rested in the hands of a few men in two very unsophisticated and suspicious countries, we didn't do it, and one American, Richard Nixon, moved the cold war away from permanent confrontation toward victory. How could any wrong that he did compare with that?" - John Sears

Last edited by pwdennis : 10-29-2002 at 11:33 AM.
pwdennis is offline  
Old 10-29-2002, 11:35 AM   #12
CpUltravox
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I started to do some research to back up my point that it's not the Yankees (I was going to prove that the second best team from the AL would have wone nearly as many of the World Series as did the Yankees... but... it turns out that not only is that statement wrong - it's unbelieveably, embarrassingly wrong).

It is the Yankees.

So... um... nevermind.
 
Old 10-29-2002, 12:15 PM   #13
pwdennis
NetShrine All-Century Team
 
pwdennis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Winter Springs, FL
Posts: 2,503
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by CpUltravox
I started to do some research to back up my point that it's not the Yankees (I was going to prove that the second best team from the AL would have wone nearly as many of the World Series as did the Yankees... but... it turns out that not only is that statement wrong - it's unbelieveably, embarrassingly wrong).

It is the Yankees.

So... um... nevermind.


Actually, more to the point, it's unknowable.

There have been many seasons in which a particular NL team also was much better than its counterparts. That's actually the bad part about the current playoff set-up. There are years where the best team(s) doesn't make it to the World Series
__________________
"I would submit that if the world survives for a million years, perhaps its finest hour may be that in the last half of the 20th century, when the power to blow up the world rested in the hands of a few men in two very unsophisticated and suspicious countries, we didn't do it, and one American, Richard Nixon, moved the cold war away from permanent confrontation toward victory. How could any wrong that he did compare with that?" - John Sears
pwdennis is offline  
Old 10-29-2002, 12:17 PM   #14
CpUltravox
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well.. I was at least trying to prove that the teams the Yankees produced were superior to he other AL teams, but only marginally so. But the proof as I started seemed to be that the Yankees were in may cases MUCH better than the next best AL team, so I gave up, and gave in.
 
Old 10-29-2002, 12:42 PM   #15
pathogan
william Blake's Innkeeper
 
pathogan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 2,828
Red face Gee another not too subtle Yankee

...thread...zzzzzzzzzzzzzz
pathogan is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
World Series Veterans TreAnt985 2003 Baseball Trivia Archives 7 04-08-2003 05:41 PM
World Series is tied, 2-2 nyy26wc Around The Majors Reports 1 10-24-2002 01:03 PM
World Series starts tonight nyy26wc Around The Majors Reports 1 10-19-2002 10:10 AM
Greatest World Series Game NetShrine 2001 Baseball History Archives 1 11-01-2001 06:30 PM
World Series, position by position satchel 2001 Hot Baseball Chatter Archives 6 10-24-2001 10:47 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Thread Contents Copyrighted In Perpetuity by NetShrine.com