![]() |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | |
|
NetShrine Creator & Curator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NetShrine WHQ
Posts: 5,548
|
Schilling Blames Boras/Hicks For Baseball's Woes
http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/sports/baseball/3746324.htm
Quote:
I can never recall a player blaming an agent (his or another) for what's wrong with baseball. Wow. On ESPN's OTLW this AM, Boras responded that Schilling should not use his excellence as a platform to address one player signing/contract - address the system, sure, he added - but, he didn't seem too pleased, overall.
__________________
Steve, Forum Administrator "They come and they go, Hobbs. They come and they go." That's why there's NetShrine.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Netshrine Vacuum Cleaner
|
Boras does seem to cause problems. When teams refuse to deal with a particular agent, that is a problem. Hicks is a hypocrite, giving A-Rod 252 million then becoming one of the hardline owners.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
NetShrine All-Century Team
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Winter Springs, FL
Posts: 2,503
|
Personally, I agree with Schilling but he didn't go far enough. To the unholy duo of Hicks and Boras I would have added Donald Fehr, an unworthy successor to Marvin Miller
__________________
"I would submit that if the world survives for a million years, perhaps its finest hour may be that in the last half of the 20th century, when the power to blow up the world rested in the hands of a few men in two very unsophisticated and suspicious countries, we didn't do it, and one American, Richard Nixon, moved the cold war away from permanent confrontation toward victory. How could any wrong that he did compare with that?" - John Sears |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
|
I enjoyed watching Boras' reaction this morning on OTL. Not so much what he said, but just the look on his face before his response. I thought it said a lot, and I think he had to really temper his words.
I think the implications are pretty big. Having one of the premier players in the game speak out against an agent and an owner certainly doesn't give an impression of true solidarity. Somone this morning - I think on Sports Reporters - mentioned that NBA players now had to settle for contracts of $89 million instead of $120 million, and that baseball players might have to settle for less too. I didn't know what to think of that statement. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Netshrine Vacuum Cleaner
|
Quote:
I'll settle for 89 million! Imagine the hardship of being Shaq or Kobe, and not being able to buy that small island nation they've always wanted because they couldn't have the extra 31 million dollars. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
NetShrine's Historian
|
Quote:
Well, then, add Selig and Deputy Dupuy to the list too.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Netshrine Cleanup Hitter
|
Boras is upset? He'll have to deal with it. Schilling hit this nail on the head.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: washington dc
Posts: 2,625
|
Quote:
there was an article about Fehr in the NYT the other day. said fehr and miller still speak weekly to talk strategy. although they have a good relationship, Miller has, at times, criticized Fehr for giving too much away in negotiations (!)..........(!!!) Fehr does what the players want him to do. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
NetShrine's Magic 8-Ball
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Where the cops speak slow and the air is nice
Posts: 2,591
|
It's things like this (Schilling) coupled with the mayhem created by Selig's couple day "lifting" of the gag order on the owners that leads me to believe there are some real rifts/fears/concerns on both sides.
The hardliners on both sides are running MLB towards the abyss (or playing chicken -- can't quite decide on my metaphore/cliche') and it sounds like some members are starting to get nervous. Do the moderates have enough voice/votes? Tune in Friday... |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Membership Suspended 11/19/02
Join Date: May 2002
Location: VNV Nation
Posts: 2,952
|
Kudos to Curt Schilling for speaking honestly knowing he'll obviously take a lot of heat for his comments.
The problem with Boras in this whole mess is that he has an agenda -- to try to destroy the draft and punish owners as much as possible for paying "below-market" wages to players for their first six years. Now that's his job as an agent and he's good at it. But people like Boras exacerbate the contentious relationship between players/owners. |
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Socs
Posts: 3,400
|
Quote:
I think this was in poor taste, to be honest. To basically point to an agent and say "you ruined baseball by taking an owner up on his own idiocy," is silly. I don't see Schilling renouncing his giant contract extension -- ESPECIALLY when his team is already in financial trouble. i wouldn't fault boras, either, at least not on this one. there are plenty of examples of a sports agent almost extorting owners, but heck, that's their job -- i'm not defending the action though. but a-rod is not boras's fault. only hicks is to blame for $25M -- hicks AND boras would be to blame for ~$20M or so though... but in this case, hicks outbid himself. maybe it's just my dislike for schilling here, but I really don't think so. read the quote again -- you could have put that in mo vaughn or troy percival's mouth early this season, and we'd be saying it was "sad" that players would resort to "personal affronts." But the minute someone says nasty things about a guy we already dislike, we're applauding it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | ||
|
Membership Suspended 11/19/02
Join Date: May 2002
Location: VNV Nation
Posts: 2,952
|
Quote:
Schilling is making what...60 percent of what Mike Mussina gets? A-Rod is Boras' and A-Rod's fault...There was no way Boras was going to let A-Rod take anything less than a groundbreaking contract, and all the talk of "Seattle's going to see just why they won last year ('00). Seattle offered 4 years, $80 million? A-Rod wanted to play for the Mets but Boras scared them off with some outrageous demands. Coming out of any other player's mouth, the reaction would have been the same. Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
NetShrine All-Century Team
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Winter Springs, FL
Posts: 2,503
|
Quote:
okay, I will I think one of the big problems is an artificial solidarity caused by a lack of secret ballots in union voting - I suspect that a lot of players really don't like the MLBPA stance but are afraid to say so
__________________
"I would submit that if the world survives for a million years, perhaps its finest hour may be that in the last half of the 20th century, when the power to blow up the world rested in the hands of a few men in two very unsophisticated and suspicious countries, we didn't do it, and one American, Richard Nixon, moved the cold war away from permanent confrontation toward victory. How could any wrong that he did compare with that?" - John Sears |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
NetShrine All-Star
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 112
|
If there is some simmering resentment towards Boras from some established players (a la Schilling), I suspect it has more to do with his work (capitalizing on loopholes, etc.) in landing astronomical signing bonuses for draft picks. The MLBPA doesn't seem too thrilled (jealousy?) with the bonuses paid out to unproven talent these days.
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Netshrine Vacuum Cleaner
|
The bonuses paid to draft picks in all sports are crazy, baseball the most so. Very rare are the players that can be drafted and become productive mlb players within a year or two. Players should show they can play well, then get the money.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Should Schilling Pitch Game 4? | NetShrine | 2001 Hot Baseball Chatter Archives | 47 | 11-02-2001 12:11 PM |