NetShrine Discussion Forum  

Go Back   NetShrine Discussion Forum > NDF Archives > NDF's 2nd Year - 2002 > 2002 Baseball History Archives
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

View Poll Results: Will Barry Larkin get into the Hall
Larkin will get in and deserves to 10 58.82%
Larkin will get in but does not deserve to 2 11.76%
Larkin will not get in but does deserve to 2 11.76%
Larkin will not get in and is not worthy 3 17.65%
Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 07-27-2002, 11:29 PM   #1
JamesI
Netshrine Vacuum Cleaner
 
JamesI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Potsdam, N.Y.
Posts: 3,723
Send a message via ICQ to JamesI Send a message via Yahoo to JamesI
Default Barry Larkin and the Hall of Fame

The debates about Ozzie Smith, Luis Aparicio, Alan Trammell, et al has made me wonder about the next potential hall of fame active shortstop.

Question 1 Will Barry Larkin make the hall?
Question 2 Does he deserve to?
JamesI is offline  
Old 07-28-2002, 12:10 AM   #2
sweaver
Netshrine Cleanup Hitter
 
sweaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Mountain State
Posts: 8,883
Send a message via AIM to sweaver Send a message via Yahoo to sweaver
Default

I am on record with this already, but yes to both questions. Barry both has the credentials to be elected to the Hall (.290+ career average, over 180 home runs, over 360 steals, Gold Gloves, an MVP) and will be elected. He was the best SS in the NL for several years.
sweaver is offline  
Old 07-28-2002, 12:34 AM   #3
Max Power
NetShrine Creator & Curator
 
Max Power's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NetShrine WHQ
Posts: 5,548
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by sweaver
I am on record with this already

As were most of us here:
http://www.netshrine.com/vbulletin2/...&threadid=4902

My answers - yes & no
__________________
Steve, Forum Administrator

"They come and they go, Hobbs. They come and they go." That's why there's NetShrine.com
Max Power is offline  
Old 07-28-2002, 12:38 AM   #4
SmedIndy
NetShrine's Historian
 
SmedIndy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Zionsville, IN
Posts: 10,569
Send a message via AIM to SmedIndy
Default

Yes and yes...coming from the Crowbar man, that means a lot.
SmedIndy is offline  
Old 07-28-2002, 12:41 AM   #5
pwdennis
NetShrine All-Century Team
 
pwdennis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Winter Springs, FL
Posts: 2,503
Default

Yes and Yes

The forum has changed my opinion in this case. I had thought he might have difficulty getting in
__________________
"I would submit that if the world survives for a million years, perhaps its finest hour may be that in the last half of the 20th century, when the power to blow up the world rested in the hands of a few men in two very unsophisticated and suspicious countries, we didn't do it, and one American, Richard Nixon, moved the cold war away from permanent confrontation toward victory. How could any wrong that he did compare with that?" - John Sears
pwdennis is offline  
Old 07-28-2002, 01:20 AM   #6
LeGrandOrange
Membership Suspended 4/11/04
 
LeGrandOrange's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 3,783
Default

I've long believed that Barry Larkin has been a hall of famer...there was no one even close to Barry's skill as an all-around shortstop in the National League during his time, the next best SS was that hall of fame guy that played in Saint Lou, and we of course know what his forte was.
He easily fills the HOF requirement for prolonged excellence at a position (and is helped by the relative lack of super-shortstops in the NL)...the only question about Larkin is what style of Reds cap will be on his plaque.
LeGrandOrange is offline  
Old 07-28-2002, 04:57 AM   #7
VNV Nation
Membership Suspended 11/19/02
 
VNV Nation's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: VNV Nation
Posts: 2,952
Default

Larkin should be in, first ballot, no question. He's the greatest NL shortstop since Wagner, and I'm not convinced any of the Big Three other than A-Rod is appreciably better than Larkin.
VNV Nation is offline  
Old 07-28-2002, 09:16 AM   #8
TGwynn19
Guest
 
TGwynn19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 2,087
Send a message via AIM to TGwynn19
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by SmedIndy
Yes and yes...coming from the Crowbar man, that means a lot.

If you do say so yourself!

I'd answer yes and yes also.
TGwynn19 is offline  
Old 07-28-2002, 04:30 PM   #9
moose
 
moose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Socs
Posts: 3,400
Default

roundabout, I've Seen All Good People

(yes and yes)
moose is offline  
Old 07-29-2002, 11:50 AM   #10
Ytown Tribe fan
Guest
 
Ytown Tribe fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Scrappers territory
Posts: 2,515
Default

I went No and Yes. I believe Barry will have difficulty getting in unless he has at least two more fine seasons.

He absolutely belongs in the Hall of Fame, but the BBWAA doesn't always recognize it.

Look at Gary Carter!

Hell, I think Tim Raines will have trouble getting in right away.
Ytown Tribe fan is offline  
Old 07-29-2002, 11:52 AM   #11
JamesI
Netshrine Vacuum Cleaner
 
JamesI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Potsdam, N.Y.
Posts: 3,723
Send a message via ICQ to JamesI Send a message via Yahoo to JamesI
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Ytown Tribe fan

Look at Gary Carter!

Hell, I think Tim Raines will have trouble getting in right away.

I'm still undecided on Larkin, but Carter and Raines should have no trouble. The writers won't see it that way. Hopefully Carter can get in next year.
JamesI is offline  
Old 07-29-2002, 11:53 AM   #12
poorme
Guest
 
poorme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: washington dc
Posts: 2,625
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Ytown Tribe fan
He absolutely belongs in the Hall of Fame, but the BBWAA doesn't always recognize it.

Look at Gary Carter!

I agree. although "absolutely" might be a little strong.
poorme is offline  
Old 07-29-2002, 12:33 PM   #13
KCBOOMER
NetShrine All-Century Team
 
KCBOOMER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Home of the T-Bones
Posts: 11,116
Default

I think Larkin will get in and probably deserves to. He is very fortunate that his career is winding down when it did. If he was five years younger he would be lost in the glare of the big three and Tejada.
__________________
KCBOOMER

Buck O'Neil: The Monarch of Baseball
KCBOOMER is offline  
Old 07-29-2002, 12:40 PM   #14
pathogan
william Blake's Innkeeper
 
pathogan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 2,828
Talking no and no

I remember this one before,it sort of the dave concepcion argument[though Larkin gets hurt ,alot] I dont think larkin should get in with those numbers.Was he really the dominant ss of his time?Forget the Vetereans comitte guys[ reese, scooter, Marion] he doesnt seem to stack up. Kind of dwight evans-like...
pathogan is offline  
Old 07-29-2002, 01:04 PM   #15
WiredTiger
Guest
 
WiredTiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: The city of Kaline, Cobb and Greenberg
Posts: 3,395
Default

I would say yes. It would be tough to keep Larkin out. Larkin was better in his prime than Cal Ripken but just couldn't stay healthy enough to be a superstar.

He has the stats but for some reason doesn't seem like a HOF. He wasn't flashy and his last five seasons have been injury plauged. If Larkin is kept out than there will be a lot of other ss/2b that are kept out too.
WiredTiger is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Thread Contents Copyrighted In Perpetuity by NetShrine.com