Cub Fans A Different Breed

[gyb13]

Originally posted by satchel
Sweeping generalizations are always bad!

Sweeping generalizations are always bad! Sweeping generalizations are always bad! Sweeping generalizations are always bad! ("yes, we're all individuals!")

[moose]

Originally posted by satchel
It would be duplicitous of me not to call you to the carpet for this statement. please revise: some of the fans in chicago are too drunk to notice the game going on.

(solving math equations on blackboard)
(flipping rings on abacus)
(punching keys on calculator)
(pulling ping pong balls out of lottery machine)
(measuring sammy sosa's bicep)

no, no, i think ALL of the fans in chicago are too drunk to notice the game going on.

[SmedIndy]

Originally posted by gyb13
i think the fans in chicago are too drunk to notice the game going on

Hey, I resemble that remark <hic>....

[sweaver]

Originally posted by gyb13

Sweeping generalizations are always bad! Sweeping generalizations are always bad! Sweeping generalizations are always bad! ("yes, we're all individuals!")

No, no, my friends. This should be, "Sweeping generalizations are ALWAYS wrong!"

[sweaver]

And by the way, if I've told you once, I've told you a million times, don't exaggerate!

[satchel]

Originally posted by moose

(solving math equations on blackboard)
(flipping rings on abacus)
(punching keys on calculator)
(pulling ping pong balls out of lottery machine)
(measuring sammy sosa's bicep)

no, no, i think ALL of the fans in chicago are too drunk to notice the game going on.

Well, if you can substantiate the sweeping generalization, that's a whole other kettle of fish.

all right, sorry - this has meandered way off topic and I think it's nearly entirely my fault. bad satchel!