NetShrine Discussion Forum  

Go Back   NetShrine Discussion Forum > NDF Archives > NDF's 2nd Year - 2002 > 2002 Baseball History Archives
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

View Poll Results: On the list of greatest ever, Hank Aaron ranks:
1st 0 0%
2nd 0 0%
3-5 7 22.58%
6-10 14 45.16%
11-20 6 19.35%
21-30 1 3.23%
the best since WWII 0 0%
second-best of his generation (to Mays) 0 0%
top five of post-war players 3 9.68%
in the top 100 all-time, but lower than 30th 0 0%
Voters: 31. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 05-09-2002, 12:43 PM   #1
sweaver
Netshrine Cleanup Hitter
 
sweaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Mountain State
Posts: 8,883
Send a message via AIM to sweaver Send a message via Yahoo to sweaver
Default Hank Aaron's rank among the Greatest

Well, since Duque brought it up......

Where does Aaron rank among the greatest of all time? Can you back up your opinion with some facts? Let's have a good rumble here....
sweaver is offline  
Old 05-09-2002, 01:10 PM   #2
calexpat
All-NetShrine Team Member
 
calexpat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Haven, CT
Posts: 448
Default

Ruth, Mays, Wagner, and probably Johnson are clearly above him, either because they stood/stand out from the pack more (Ruth, Wagner, Johnson) or they beat him head to head (Mays).

Then he'd have to duke it out with Williams, Bonds, Cobb, Mantle Schmidt, Gehrig, Grove, Clemens etc., and everyone would kill each other arguing about cross-era comparisons, pitcher vs. position player, peak vs. career value, how to measure defense, etc. none of which we are in the position to resolve here.

Personally, I'd end up with him in the top ten, because I tend to give a boost for playing post-WWII and to give credit for durability and consistency.

Which brings up the [obvious] point that the all-time numbers overlap violently with era-specific numbers. I understand the idea, but it gives people a cop-out doesn't it? .

Plus, isn't it a bit arbitrary to say you can compare, say, the Mays-Aaron era with the Bonds-Clemens era, but not with the Ruth-Gehrig era?

Last edited by calexpat : 05-09-2002 at 01:29 PM.
calexpat is offline  
Old 05-09-2002, 01:13 PM   #3
poorme
Guest
 
poorme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: washington dc
Posts: 2,625
Default

I'm waiting to vote on this one. I generally think he is an underrated ballplayer. Most people know him for breaking the home run record and for playing a long time. Plus, a lot of people saw him in the twilight of his career. From the things I've read he was an outstanding player in all aspects of the game. I guess when someone pulls out the win shares numbers I'll go with that.
poorme is offline  
Old 05-09-2002, 01:20 PM   #4
nightal
NetShrine MVP
 
nightal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: oklahoma
Posts: 262
Talking

I happen to think the opposite about Aaron. I believe he ranks 11-20 behind the usual suspects. He won only 1 MVP, which no matter what anyone in 2002 thinks, does refect the on the impressions he made on "50s and 60s sportswriters.
In mid-career he switched to a hitters park and was, as I recall, very healthy during his career and had no military service which enabled him to accumulate his gaudy stats on a ton of plate appearances.
But under a severe sabermetric microscope, his stats are not as spectacular as one might think.
Come get me guys!!
nightal is offline  
Old 05-09-2002, 01:27 PM   #5
SmedIndy
NetShrine's Historian
 
SmedIndy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Zionsville, IN
Posts: 10,569
Send a message via AIM to SmedIndy
Default

But his peak was in County Stadium, and that was a pitcher's park, so his changing parks in mid-stream argument doesn't hold water.

And I really can't take anything away from someone who was healthy and didn't have any interruptions in his career. It's like discounting Ripken because he played in every game....
SmedIndy is offline  
Old 05-09-2002, 01:28 PM   #6
WiredTiger
Guest
 
WiredTiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: The city of Kaline, Cobb and Greenberg
Posts: 3,395
Default

Aaron was very good for a very long time. I guess it all comes down to whether you are a fan of peak performance or longevity.
WiredTiger is offline  
Old 05-09-2002, 01:29 PM   #7
nightal
NetShrine MVP
 
nightal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: oklahoma
Posts: 262
Default

And another thing about Aaron, he is the most bitter ex-player I've ever heard interviewed.
This has always rubbed me the wrong way. Please spare me the usual 1974 stuff, others have had to deal with the same things and somehow remained, at least, positive about their baseball past.
I read something one time about how he thought he was superior to Mays in every aspect of the game. You could just feel the bitterness in his voice, even in print.
Ruth, Williams, Wagner, Johnson, Mantle, Musial, Grove, Hornsby, Gehrig,Mays, Bonds, Foxx, and Alexander rank ahead of him in my opinion.
nightal is offline  
Old 05-09-2002, 01:33 PM   #8
SmedIndy
NetShrine's Historian
 
SmedIndy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Zionsville, IN
Posts: 10,569
Send a message via AIM to SmedIndy
Default

Obviously you never had direct death threats. And the Braves have treated him with some contempt afterwards. He has every right to be bitter.

I can't rate Hornsby better than him, for reasons explained elsewhere. Nor Alexander. And Mantle has those injuries.


Last edited by SmedIndy : 05-09-2002 at 01:36 PM.
SmedIndy is offline  
Old 05-09-2002, 01:40 PM   #9
nightal
NetShrine MVP
 
nightal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: oklahoma
Posts: 262
Wink

I never compared myself to Aaron, It would not be fair to him, ha ha. I was comparing other players that, in your words, had death threats etc. and dealt with predudices. Also, I did say stuff the 1974 opinions, they have been rehashed forever.
nightal is offline  
Old 05-09-2002, 01:40 PM   #10
Slippery Pedro
NetShrine Creator & Curator
 
Slippery Pedro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NetShrine WHQ
Posts: 999
Default

Code:
RUNS CREATED/GAME DIFF PLAYER LEAGUE 1 Babe Ruth 16.28 24.23 7.94 2 Ty Cobb 8.79 15.59 6.80 3 Stan Musial 8.20 15.27 7.07 4 Tris Speaker 7.54 14.47 6.93 5 Mel Ott 7.40 14.82 7.43 6 Cap Anson 6.75 15.65 8.90 7 Honus Wagner 6.50 13.29 6.79 8 Willie Mays 5.72 12.37 6.64 9 Frank Robinson 5.56 11.94 6.38 10 Nap Lajoie 5.48 12.21 6.73 11 Hank Aaron 4.99 11.53 6.53

the above is based on 10,000 PA. If you more the PA down to 7500, Hank slides all the way down to #28.
__________________
Steve, Forum Administrator

PLEASE READ: Community Standards . : ~ : PLEASE SHOP: Our Stuff! : ~ : HOW CAN YOU: Help? : ~ : BE NICE: To Your Fav Baseball Person. : ~ : ARE YOU: Posting Correctly?
Slippery Pedro is offline  
Old 05-09-2002, 01:44 PM   #11
Long John - RJ
 
Posts: n/a
Lightbulb

I disagree with you, nightal. Sure he only won 1 MVP, but he led the NL in HR and RBI 4 years each over a 10 year span, none during the Korean War years (his first year of each is 57). The fact that he was still effective at age 40 while passing Babe Ruth in all-time home runs (.268, 20, 90 over 112 games) is a testament to his durability and perserverance. And did he quit when he beat the record? No. He played for 2 more seasons. His career OPS is .929!!! The league average during the time he played was .722. He was a giant throughout his career. I voted top 5 post war, but I could easily be convinced to say 3-5 and def 6-10.

Oh and he also has the most RBIs, total bases and extra base hits ever.
 
Old 05-09-2002, 01:46 PM   #12
SmedIndy
NetShrine's Historian
 
SmedIndy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Zionsville, IN
Posts: 10,569
Send a message via AIM to SmedIndy
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by nightal
I never compared myself to Aaron, It would not be fair to him, ha ha. I was comparing other players that, in your words, had death threats etc. and dealt with predudices. Also, I did say stuff the 1974 opinions, they have been rehashed forever.

So they've been rehashed? It doesn't diminish them one iota. I don't think anyone sent verifiable death threats against Lou Gehrig.

Most of the other guys are real SOBs too, so don't hold it against Aaron. I mean, I wouldn't want to cross Hornsby or Grove, and Pete Alexander was a real sorry case. Personality should not enter this discussion at all.
SmedIndy is offline  
Old 05-09-2002, 01:49 PM   #13
Long John - RJ
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Runs created based on an at-bat plateau is going to be biased against Aaron because he has the 2nd most trips to the plate of all-time.

It takes good conditioning, some talent, some luck and a whole lot of determination to get to the plate 12000+ times. The man deserves credit for that much.

I suppose the fact that he had his hands on the bat the wrong way for some of his professional career holds no sway.
 
Old 05-09-2002, 02:00 PM   #14
wyvern37
Membership Revoked 9/11/02
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 58
Default

I think there is a decent argument that Hank Aaron is under-rated! For one thing, he is just about identical to Mays in hitting AND he had more outstanding years than Mays did. Mays obviously has a huge edge in fielding, but by all accounts, Aaron was an exceptional rightfielder.

Since someone complained about "non-traditional stats", here are the "traditional" ones:
Hank Aaron .305/.374/.555
Willie Mays .302/.384/.557

They are virtually identical. So if Mays is in the top 10 (which he obviously is), then Aaron cannot be too far behind. Bill James' lists Aaron as the 10th best [major league] player in his Win Shares book and he has the fourth highest Win Share total of all-time (one win share ahead of Mays.)

And by the way, criticizing him for never hitting 50 homers has to be a joke.

Karim
wyvern37 is offline  
Old 05-09-2002, 02:08 PM   #15
nightal
NetShrine MVP
 
nightal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: oklahoma
Posts: 262
Question

Last post on this one for me:

1. Can anyone say they would take Aaron ahead of Mays or Williams? or Bonds for that matter. (post WW2 players) I personally would even take Musial.
2. If personality is taken out of it Smed what is the knock on Hornsby?, His "Bill James perceived lack of defense"?
nightal is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Indians' offseason [Merged Threads] gyb13 2003 Hot Baseball Chatter Archives 103 02-24-2003 01:39 PM
Maddux back to Braves [merged threads] JamesI 2002 Active Player News, Analysis, & Commentary Archives 12 12-21-2002 03:38 PM
Royals trading Beltran? [merged threads] Dr. Bob 2002 Active Player News, Analysis, & Commentary Archives 21 12-21-2002 02:16 PM
Say Hey To The New Devil Rey! [merged threads] Max Power 2002 Active Player News, Analysis, & Commentary Archives 29 12-20-2002 10:09 AM
This year's VC ballot [merged threads] sweaver 2002 Baseball History Archives 40 12-18-2002 07:56 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Thread Contents Copyrighted In Perpetuity by NetShrine.com