NetShrine Discussion Forum  

Go Back   NetShrine Discussion Forum > NDF Archives > Defunct NDF Forums > The NetShrine Gallery > Rejected Candidates
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

View Poll Results: Should Bob Elliott Be In NetShrine?
Yes 13 59.09%
No 9 40.91%
Voters: 22. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 09-13-2006, 10:21 AM   #1
Crash Course
NetShrine Creator & Curator
 
Crash Course's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NetShrine WHQ
Posts: 10,070
Arrow Robert Irving Elliott "Mr. Team"

He played in the major leagues from 1939 to 1953.
__________________
Steve, Forum Admin

Hit Grass, Win Salad

Man, this is baseball. You gotta stop thinking. Just have fun.
- Benny "The Jet" Rodriguez, in The Sandlot

I've been going to games since August 8, 1973....and on August 22, 2004, finally, a foul ball came my way. I had to reach for it, and it deflected off the tip of my right index finger. Shoot, if I was only 4 inches taller!

Have you read The Baseball Same Game?
Crash Course is offline  
Old 09-13-2006, 10:34 AM   #2
nyy26wc
NetShrine All-Century Team
 
nyy26wc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 14,584
Default

265 career RCAA
back to back 40+ years in 1947-48
3 years with 30+
6 years with 20+
+1.33 RC/G vs. the league average
__________________
Lee

Creator, Complete Baseball Encyclopedia. It's powerful, yet extremely easy to use. Features extensive sorting and stat display options. The CBE has many features that are not available in online and printed sources. Has 2006 stats and daily update service for 2007.
nyy26wc is offline  
Old 09-13-2006, 10:37 AM   #3
rc3000
Inducted Into The NetShrine Assembly of Fame
 
rc3000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 543
Default

Now this is interesting. My first reply was going to be sarcastic. Although I feel like I have a reasonable historical knowledge I had never heard of him. So I looked him up and was suprised to see some of the info about him:
7 time all star
MVP
good number of top ten finishes in many different categories.

I am going to sit back and read the arguements before casting my vote.

I didn't get chance to go over to Braves field a lot back in the 40's but maybe some of the other Boston Area people (RedSeat? DeepBlue?) can fill us in on the memories of seeing him play

As a side note RedSeat, if you are reading this, over the summer I met the Granddaughter of the man whose hat/head was struck by the Ted Williams home run.
__________________
Anytime you have an opportunity to make things better and you don't, then you are wasting your time on this Earth - Roberto Clemente
rc3000 is offline  
Old 09-13-2006, 10:41 AM   #4
rc3000
Inducted Into The NetShrine Assembly of Fame
 
rc3000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nyy26wc
265 career RCAA
back to back 40+ years in 1947-48
3 years with 30+
6 years with 20+
+1.33 RC/G vs. the league average
So that is a yes? General question Lee, what are the levels that you consider for a season:
20+ = good
30+ = really good
40+=great
50+= out of this world?
__________________
Anytime you have an opportunity to make things better and you don't, then you are wasting your time on this Earth - Roberto Clemente
rc3000 is offline  
Old 09-13-2006, 12:20 PM   #5
nyy26wc
NetShrine All-Century Team
 
nyy26wc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 14,584
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rc3000
So that is a yes? General question Lee, what are the levels that you consider for a season:
20+ = good
30+ = really good
40+=great
50+= out of this world?

It is a yes.

As to the general question, for years I've avoided that kind of question. I prefer simply to look at the data without putting subjective labels to it.
__________________
Lee

Creator, Complete Baseball Encyclopedia. It's powerful, yet extremely easy to use. Features extensive sorting and stat display options. The CBE has many features that are not available in online and printed sources. Has 2006 stats and daily update service for 2007.
nyy26wc is offline  
Old 09-13-2006, 12:43 PM   #6
captain_napalm
NetShrine All-Century Team
 
captain_napalm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: ny
Posts: 1,611
Send a message via AIM to captain_napalm
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rc3000
Now this is interesting. My first reply was going to be sarcastic.

I was going to go for a "Bob & Ray" joke, but figured many would've missed it.
__________________
"Cheating is baseball's oldest profession. No other game is so rich in skullduggery, so suited to it or so proud of it." - Thomas Boswell
captain_napalm is offline  
Old 09-13-2006, 01:47 PM   #7
KCBOOMER
NetShrine All-Century Team
 
KCBOOMER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Home of the T-Bones
Posts: 11,116
Default

Elliott had your basic "under the radar" type career. He had three good seasons during WWII, but had even better ones after it. Playing for the Pirates (for dreadful teams) and then the Braves (pre-Aaron) kept him out of the media spotlight. His career OPS+ of 124 is very good. Went to a number of ASG's and did well in the MVP voting.
__________________
KCBOOMER

Buck O'Neil: The Monarch of Baseball
KCBOOMER is offline  
Old 09-13-2006, 03:27 PM   #8
rc3000
Inducted Into The NetShrine Assembly of Fame
 
rc3000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nyy26wc
I prefer simply to look at the data without putting subjective labels to it.

Fair enough. I know that you have explained RCAA a million times (probably ten times to me alone), but I assume since it is against average then a 20+ RCAA is relatively the same from year to year. It is equally impressive (?) in a hitting year (1930) as it is in a pitcher's year (1968) since the average player in that year is 0.

I guess I am trying to get a basis when looking at the data when you present it. So let me ask my question a different way have you done an analysis of RCAA to determine a percentile of players that exceed 20,30 or 40 RCAA either across decades or all-time? Or should I just look at the number and say this player created 20 more runs in a given season then what the average player would have done and, to me, that seems pretty good.
__________________
Anytime you have an opportunity to make things better and you don't, then you are wasting your time on this Earth - Roberto Clemente
rc3000 is offline  
Old 09-13-2006, 03:28 PM   #9
rc3000
Inducted Into The NetShrine Assembly of Fame
 
rc3000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 543
Default

Oh yeah and I did vote yes. Now that he has been presented I just might remember him.
__________________
Anytime you have an opportunity to make things better and you don't, then you are wasting your time on this Earth - Roberto Clemente
rc3000 is offline  
Old 09-13-2006, 03:55 PM   #10
nyy26wc
NetShrine All-Century Team
 
nyy26wc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 14,584
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rc3000
I guess I am trying to get a basis when looking at the data when you present it. So let me ask my question a different way have you done an analysis of RCAA to determine a percentile of players that exceed 20,30 or 40 RCAA either across decades or all-time? Or should I just look at the number and say this player created 20 more runs in a given season then what the average player would have done and, to me, that seems pretty good.

I think that the best approach is the latter.
__________________
Lee

Creator, Complete Baseball Encyclopedia. It's powerful, yet extremely easy to use. Features extensive sorting and stat display options. The CBE has many features that are not available in online and printed sources. Has 2006 stats and daily update service for 2007.
nyy26wc is offline  
Old 09-15-2006, 09:56 AM   #11
Jayhawk Bob
NetShrine MVP
 
Jayhawk Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 278
Default

How Elliott compares to the median performance levels for current Hall of Fame third basemen:

XBH: Elliott - 646, HOF Median - 593
RBI: Elliott - 1195, HOF Median - 1144
Hits + Walks: Elliott - 3028, HOF Median - 3015
OBP: Elliott - .375, HOF Median - .365
SLG: Elliott - .440, HOF Median - .442
OPS: Elliott - .815, HOF Median - .807
OPS+: Elliott - 124, HOF Median - 121.5

I'm not sure he would belong in a Hall of Fame that had the actual ten best third basemen ever instead of five greats and five unworthy guys, but the fact that he measures up well to the real life group makes him memorable enough for NetShrine recognition.
__________________
Mient-kie-wicz (Ment kay' vich) n. [[Polish, mientkiewicz, sub-par]] 1. less than ordinary, below average 2. inferior, especially in baseball.
Jayhawk Bob is offline  
Old 09-15-2006, 03:21 PM   #12
mainsr
NetShrine All-Century Team
 
mainsr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Saratoga Springs, NY
Posts: 1,557
Default

Tough decision. Guy never led the league in anything, except walks, and that was just once. Top 5 in park-adjusted OPS just twice. Top 5 in OBP just once.

He's No. 18 in Win Shares, 19 in WARP-3.

I'll pass.
__________________
"Let's let bye-byes be bye-byes."
--The Greatest Leadoff Hitter of All Time
mainsr is offline  
Old 09-15-2006, 04:43 PM   #13
Jayhawk Bob
NetShrine MVP
 
Jayhawk Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 278
Default

MVP third basemen:

1947 NL - Bob Elliott
1953 AL - Al Rosen
1964 NL - Ken Boyer
1964 AL - Brooks Robinson
1969 AL - Harmon Killebrew
1971 NL - Joe Torre
1980 AL - George Brett
1980 NL - Mike Schmidt
1981 NL - Mike Schmidt
1986 NL - Mike Schmidt
1991 NL - Terry Pendleton
1996 NL - Ken Caminiti
1999 NL - Chipper Jones
2005 AL - Alex Rodriguez

Looks like a pretty memorable list to me. Well, except for Pendleton. Never will figure that one out.
__________________
Mient-kie-wicz (Ment kay' vich) n. [[Polish, mientkiewicz, sub-par]] 1. less than ordinary, below average 2. inferior, especially in baseball.
Jayhawk Bob is offline  
Old 09-21-2006, 04:06 AM   #14
Nuclear Dish
NetShrine All-Star
 
Nuclear Dish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 114
Send a message via Yahoo to Nuclear Dish
Default

In my opinion, Al Rosen was the best 3B of that era (50's). Bob Elliott was #2, and he was the best NL 3B.

Does that make him memorable enough to be enShrined? I'm not so sure.

I'm leaning toward voting for him, but he's awfully borderline. His counting numbers are nothing special, but his OPS+ and RCAA numbers are good enough. I want to vote for him, but something is gnawing at me that he doesn't belong.
__________________
"Sure I botched that sacrifice bunt. But look at it this way. I'm a better bunter than a million chinese guys. Those poor suckers can't bunt at all." - John Lowenstein.
Nuclear Dish is offline  
Old 09-21-2006, 04:08 AM   #15
Nuclear Dish
NetShrine All-Star
 
Nuclear Dish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 114
Send a message via Yahoo to Nuclear Dish
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mainsr
He's No. 18 in Win Shares, 19 in WARP-3.

You mean at his position? Or do you mean in his era?
__________________
"Sure I botched that sacrifice bunt. But look at it this way. I'm a better bunter than a million chinese guys. Those poor suckers can't bunt at all." - John Lowenstein.
Nuclear Dish is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Thread Contents Copyrighted In Perpetuity by NetShrine.com