NetShrine Discussion Forum  

Go Back   NetShrine Discussion Forum > NDF Archives > NDF's 4th Year - 2004 > Current Events Clubhouse > Seventh Inning Stretch
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

View Poll Results: Schilling or Vazquez in 2004 - Which Would You Rather Have?
Javier Vazquez 11 57.89%
Curt Schilling 5 26.32%
Not Sure - Pick 'em 3 15.79%
Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 12-04-2003, 12:02 PM   #1
Wolf Hopper
NetShrine Creator & Curator
 
Wolf Hopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NetShrine WHQ
Posts: 6,191
Question Your Pick For 2004 - Vazquez v. Schilling

Javier Vazquez or Curt Schilling
which pitcher would you rather have for 2004?
And, why?
__________________
Steve, Forum Administrator

POSTING TIP FOR THE DAY: When composing a post, think about what you would say if the intended recipient was an individual who was actually sitting just two feet in front of you, in person, rather than just some far away and anonymous audience who only can identify you as text on a PC screen - - and then write your post in that manner. It makes for remarkable and sincere discourse.
Wolf Hopper is offline  
Old 12-04-2003, 12:20 PM   #2
sweaver
Netshrine Cleanup Hitter
 
sweaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Mountain State
Posts: 8,883
Send a message via AIM to sweaver Send a message via Yahoo to sweaver
Default

Vazquez. Schilling is a terrific pitcher, but at his age there is the distinct possibility of a crash-and-burn.
sweaver is offline  
Old 12-04-2003, 12:36 PM   #3
gyb13
NS Omnipresent Brasilian
 
gyb13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Crazy George's playground
Posts: 10,903
Send a message via AIM to gyb13 Send a message via MSN to gyb13
Default

Code:
RSAA 2000 2001 2002 2003 age Schilling 22 47 36 34 37 Vazquez 14 31 6 48 27
i'm really really happy with this acquisition, as vazquez is one of my favorite (fantasy) pitchers....
__________________
Gustavo NDF Moderator
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin
gyb13 is offline  
Old 12-04-2003, 12:41 PM   #4
JamesI
Netshrine Vacuum Cleaner
 
JamesI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Potsdam, N.Y.
Posts: 3,723
Send a message via ICQ to JamesI Send a message via Yahoo to JamesI
Default

Vasquez because of the age gap. Schilling is more likely to collapse.
JamesI is offline  
Old 12-04-2003, 01:00 PM   #5
Jim Rice
Inducted Into The NetShrine Assembly of Fame
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Shawnee, KS
Posts: 783
Default

I need to qualify my answer. In a neutral, non-pressurized situation, I'd say they're about even money to pitch well in 2004. And obviously, for the long term, Vasquez is the better bet because of his age.

That said, I chose Schilling, because the reality of the situation is different than the generic question as asked. Vasquez is about to find out what it's like to pitch with people watching and some folks don't react too well to that. While Vasquez certainly seems like a cool head who can handle this kind of pressure, if this was the kind of thing that could be predicted, the Yankees wouldn't have traded for the likes of Weaver, or Mondesi, or Knoblauch, or Juan-pitch Acevedo, or any number of other people who have gone to New York and suddenly deteriorated. Some folks thrive on it (a la Jeter and Bernie Williams), some folks don't (a la Mo Vaughn or Mondesi or Weaver). Until Vasquez gets there, it's hard to tell which way he'll go. While I would bet that he turns out fine, I KNOW Schilling isn't affected by that kind of pressure.

For one year only, with the ring on the line in a pressure cooker situation like the Yankees-Red Sox rivalry, give me the veteran who has already got one ring and really wants another.
Jim Rice is offline  
Old 12-04-2003, 01:06 PM   #6
Wolf Hopper
NetShrine Creator & Curator
 
Wolf Hopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NetShrine WHQ
Posts: 6,191
Default

Good point Jim Rice.
One nitpick: Mondesi didn't cave in NY - he was what he always was. Weaver and Knobby lost their head.

Acevedo? Was he ever any good? That might be a reach.

But, back on topic, until Vazquez suits up in NY, there is a ?
Big difference between NY and Montreal. Huge.
__________________
Steve, Forum Administrator

POSTING TIP FOR THE DAY: When composing a post, think about what you would say if the intended recipient was an individual who was actually sitting just two feet in front of you, in person, rather than just some far away and anonymous audience who only can identify you as text on a PC screen - - and then write your post in that manner. It makes for remarkable and sincere discourse.
Wolf Hopper is offline  
Old 12-04-2003, 02:37 PM   #7
KCBOOMER
NetShrine All-Century Team
 
KCBOOMER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Home of the T-Bones
Posts: 11,116
Default

Went with "Not Sure" for all the reasons above.
__________________
KCBOOMER

Buck O'Neil: The Monarch of Baseball
KCBOOMER is offline  
Old 12-04-2003, 03:19 PM   #8
TGwynn19
Guest
 
TGwynn19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 2,087
Send a message via AIM to TGwynn19
Default

Vazquez. Now the world will know what we all know. He's a stud.
TGwynn19 is offline  
Old 12-04-2003, 05:42 PM   #9
huskerdru
Inducted Into The NetShrine Assembly of Fame
 
huskerdru's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Motown (or just north of it)
Posts: 540
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Rice
I need to qualify my answer. In a neutral, non-pressurized situation, I'd say they're about even money to pitch well in 2004. And obviously, for the long term, Vasquez is the better bet because of his age.

That said, I chose Schilling, because the reality of the situation is different than the generic question as asked. Vasquez is about to find out what it's like to pitch with people watching and some folks don't react too well to that. While Vasquez certainly seems like a cool head who can handle this kind of pressure, if this was the kind of thing that could be predicted, the Yankees wouldn't have traded for the likes of Weaver, or Mondesi, or Knoblauch, or Juan-pitch Acevedo, or any number of other people who have gone to New York and suddenly deteriorated. Some folks thrive on it (a la Jeter and Bernie Williams), some folks don't (a la Mo Vaughn or Mondesi or Weaver). Until Vasquez gets there, it's hard to tell which way he'll go. While I would bet that he turns out fine, I KNOW Schilling isn't affected by that kind of pressure.

For one year only, with the ring on the line in a pressure cooker situation like the Yankees-Red Sox rivalry, give me the veteran who has already got one ring and really wants another.

Ummmm...what he said!!
__________________
"Computers are stupid; they can only give you answers." - Pablo Picasso
huskerdru is offline  
Old 12-04-2003, 06:49 PM   #10
Ytown Tribe fan
Guest
 
Ytown Tribe fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Scrappers territory
Posts: 2,515
Default

Ditto what JimRice said, word for word.

Schilling probably still has a big season (and a big post-season) left in him, for a contender. After that -- forget it.
Ytown Tribe fan is offline  
Old 12-04-2003, 08:12 PM   #11
Wolf Hopper
NetShrine Creator & Curator
 
Wolf Hopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NetShrine WHQ
Posts: 6,191
Default

The pitcher most like Vaz in the last 30 years is John Smoltz, IMHO:

Code:
1973-2003 AGE <= 26 INNINGS PITCHED BETWEEN 1220 AND 1230 STRIKEOUTS >= 150 vs. the league average STRIKEOUTS/WALKS vs. the league average displayed only--not a sorting criteria BASERUNNERS/9 IP vs. the league average displayed only--not a sorting criteria RSAA RSAA IP SO SO/BB BR/9 IP 1 Javier Vazquez 52 1229.1 150 1.33 1.22 2 John Smoltz 45 1223.1 151 0.25 0.72

The year Smotz was 27, he had a terrible year. Actually, it was a terrible 1st 1/2 half and a great 2nd 1/2, IIRC, FWIW.
__________________
Steve, Forum Administrator

POSTING TIP FOR THE DAY: When composing a post, think about what you would say if the intended recipient was an individual who was actually sitting just two feet in front of you, in person, rather than just some far away and anonymous audience who only can identify you as text on a PC screen - - and then write your post in that manner. It makes for remarkable and sincere discourse.
Wolf Hopper is offline  
Old 12-04-2003, 08:42 PM   #12
LeGrandOrange
Membership Suspended 4/11/04
 
LeGrandOrange's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 3,783
Default

I picked Vazquez...though he pitches for the Evil Empire, I still like Javy exponentially more than I've ever liked Schilling.
LeGrandOrange is offline  
Old 12-04-2003, 11:21 PM   #13
clemente21
All-NetShrine Team Member
 
clemente21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 461
Default

I picked Vazquez as well. He's really emerged over the last four years. His relatively poor 2002 was heavily because of nagging injuries, stuff that might have kept him on the DL longer for another team with real pitching depth. We don't know how he's going to react to the pressure - but given the unbalanced schedule he has the potential to be a 22 game winner.
__________________
Nick

"I would like to be someone who would like to be me." - Jan Nordgreen
clemente21 is offline  
Old 12-08-2003, 10:34 PM   #14
dbergs17
Having A NetShrine Cup Of Coffee
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Bornx
Posts: 8
Default

While Schilling is obviously going to help by having a big offense to give him 5-6 runs for every game, we must recognize that being a right-handed power pitcher, the balls are gonna fly in fenway in that short right field fence. I'd take Vazquez. He's gonna win just as many wins behind just as good of a lineup, AND he has his age on his side. Curt's gonna slow down any day now.
dbergs17 is offline  
Old 12-08-2003, 11:05 PM   #15
cubfan33
NetShrine All-Century Team
 
cubfan33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,359
Send a message via Yahoo to cubfan33
Default

I'll take Schilling, thanks. He's beaten Vazquez three of the last four years in RSAA and was pretty good last year despite a pair of non-pitching injuries.
__________________
UTK available only at www.baseballprospectus.com

"I was pulling for Pete and agreeing with (commissioner) Bud Selig that Pete should be eligible for the Hall of Fame," said Giles, now chairman of the Phillies. "Bud was close to making him eligible right after his meeting with Pete (November 2002). Right after that, Pete got into tax trouble (in California), and that delayed the process."
- Phillies Chairman Bill Giles in the Dayton Daily News, January 25th, 2004.
cubfan33 is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sunday stat package--Sep 9 nyy26wc Around The Majors Reports 11 09-09-2001 02:37 PM
Sunday stat package--Aug 19 nyy26wc Around The Majors Reports 14 08-21-2001 09:12 PM
Statistical package--Aug 13 nyy26wc Around The Majors Reports 19 08-16-2001 08:49 PM
Around the majors reports--Aug 5 nyy26wc Around The Majors Reports 37 08-09-2001 11:22 AM
Sunday stat package--July 29 nyy26wc Around The Majors Reports 16 07-30-2001 08:34 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Thread Contents Copyrighted In Perpetuity by NetShrine.com