NetShrine Discussion Forum  

Go Back   NetShrine Discussion Forum > NDF Archives > NDF's 3rd Year - 2003 > 2003 Baseball History Archives
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Old 08-19-2003, 12:06 PM   #1
sweaver
Netshrine Cleanup Hitter
 
sweaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Mountain State
Posts: 8,883
Send a message via AIM to sweaver Send a message via Yahoo to sweaver
Default Mattingly v. Martinez for the Defense.

Who was the best Yankee first baseman, defensively?
sweaver is offline  
Old 08-19-2003, 12:11 PM   #2
WiredTiger
Guest
 
WiredTiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: The city of Kaline, Cobb and Greenberg
Posts: 3,395
Default

I'd go with Mattingly pre-back injury.
WiredTiger is offline  
Old 08-19-2003, 12:12 PM   #3
Skip
NetShrine Vagabond
 
Skip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Louisville
Posts: 7,866
Default

I bet Wolf will say Mattingly, defensively. Or is it that he'll defensively say Mattingly?

J/K Wolf, you know I love ya.
Skip is offline  
Old 08-19-2003, 12:16 PM   #4
sweaver
Netshrine Cleanup Hitter
 
sweaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Mountain State
Posts: 8,883
Send a message via AIM to sweaver Send a message via Yahoo to sweaver
Default

I don't know, I think you have to include the injured years for Mattingly. And if you do, Tino comes out on top.
sweaver is offline  
Old 08-19-2003, 12:17 PM   #5
gyb13
NS Omnipresent Brasilian
 
gyb13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Crazy George's playground
Posts: 10,903
Send a message via AIM to gyb13 Send a message via MSN to gyb13
Default

i'll start posting some of the 'objective' measures:

Donnie .996 Fielding % (vs .992 Lg)
Tino .995 Fielding % (vs .992 Lg)

Donnie 9.33 RF (vs 8.41 Lg)
Tino 8.80 RF (vs 8.58 Lg)
__________________
Gustavo NDF Moderator
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin
gyb13 is offline  
Old 08-19-2003, 12:34 PM   #6
Ytown Tribe fan
Guest
 
Ytown Tribe fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Scrappers territory
Posts: 2,515
Default

Mattingly has 29.0 defensive Win Shares in 14,099 innings, which is 2.06 dWS per 1000 innings.

Tino has 30.2 dWS in 11,624 innings, which is 2.60 dWS/1000 innings. That is the best rate ever, of the top 290 firstbasemen (based on defensive innings).
Ytown Tribe fan is offline  
Old 08-19-2003, 12:44 PM   #7
KCBOOMER
NetShrine All-Century Team
 
KCBOOMER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Home of the T-Bones
Posts: 11,116
Default

Well, it's not like either of them was John Mayberry!
__________________
KCBOOMER

Buck O'Neil: The Monarch of Baseball
KCBOOMER is offline  
Old 08-19-2003, 12:47 PM   #8
Wolf Hopper
NetShrine Creator & Curator
 
Wolf Hopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NetShrine WHQ
Posts: 6,191
Default

Tino is like Steve Garvey. Donnie is like Keith Hernandez.

Would anyone suggest that Garvey was better than Mex?

Even when Mattingly had the back, it never bothered him in the field.

Tino never made a mistake. Anything he could catch, he caught. His throws to 2nd on the 3-6-3 were always perfect. He was as solid as solid could be, for a normal 1B.

Mattingly did all this - and then made the incredible plays too that Tino could only dream about making. Mattingly was so gifted with the glove that he filled in at 3rd base in an emergency, as a LH thrower.

Tino could have not played 3B, even as a RH thrower.

Comparing Tino to Mattingly, in terms of the glove at 1B is like comparing a Cadilliac to a Porsche - - both are great - - but the Porche is a lot better.
__________________
Steve, Forum Administrator

POSTING TIP FOR THE DAY: When composing a post, think about what you would say if the intended recipient was an individual who was actually sitting just two feet in front of you, in person, rather than just some far away and anonymous audience who only can identify you as text on a PC screen - - and then write your post in that manner. It makes for remarkable and sincere discourse.
Wolf Hopper is offline  
Old 08-19-2003, 02:27 PM   #9
SmedIndy
NetShrine's Historian
 
SmedIndy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Zionsville, IN
Posts: 10,569
Send a message via AIM to SmedIndy
Default

But the numbers don't lie - right Nick Bakay? Or they only don't lie when they agree with your original position.
SmedIndy is offline  
Old 08-19-2003, 02:32 PM   #10
Wolf Hopper
NetShrine Creator & Curator
 
Wolf Hopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NetShrine WHQ
Posts: 6,191
Default

Fielding stats Smedie, fielding stats. What do they really tell us?
__________________
Steve, Forum Administrator

POSTING TIP FOR THE DAY: When composing a post, think about what you would say if the intended recipient was an individual who was actually sitting just two feet in front of you, in person, rather than just some far away and anonymous audience who only can identify you as text on a PC screen - - and then write your post in that manner. It makes for remarkable and sincere discourse.
Wolf Hopper is offline  
Old 08-19-2003, 02:39 PM   #11
SmedIndy
NetShrine's Historian
 
SmedIndy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Zionsville, IN
Posts: 10,569
Send a message via AIM to SmedIndy
Default

Win shares tell us a lot - Wolfie - and that's where Tino has the advantage.
SmedIndy is offline  
Old 08-19-2003, 02:41 PM   #12
Wolf Hopper
NetShrine Creator & Curator
 
Wolf Hopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NetShrine WHQ
Posts: 6,191
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmedIndy
Win shares tell us a lot - Wolfie - and that's where Tino has the advantage.

For a 1B? Educate me. How do they tell us a lot?
__________________
Steve, Forum Administrator

POSTING TIP FOR THE DAY: When composing a post, think about what you would say if the intended recipient was an individual who was actually sitting just two feet in front of you, in person, rather than just some far away and anonymous audience who only can identify you as text on a PC screen - - and then write your post in that manner. It makes for remarkable and sincere discourse.
Wolf Hopper is offline  
Old 08-19-2003, 02:46 PM   #13
SmedIndy
NetShrine's Historian
 
SmedIndy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Zionsville, IN
Posts: 10,569
Send a message via AIM to SmedIndy
Default

Have you read Win Shares - the explanation of fielding stats goes in to excrutiating detail and tries to factor in everything (handedness of staffs, prevalence of certain play combinations, etc.) and account for them. I don't have it here at work, but it's extensive.
SmedIndy is offline  
Old 08-19-2003, 02:55 PM   #14
Wolf Hopper
NetShrine Creator & Curator
 
Wolf Hopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NetShrine WHQ
Posts: 6,191
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmedIndy
Have you read Win Shares - the explanation of fielding stats goes in to excrutiating detail and tries to factor in everything (handedness of staffs, prevalence of certain play combinations, etc.) and account for them. I don't have it here at work, but it's extensive.

This is what Mickey Litchman said about it:

Quote:
Win Shares is not very good at evaluating defense. As I'm sure you also know, Win Shares in general is designed more to "evaluate" actual performance rather than ability, which although related are not the same thing. In other words, Win Shares is better at answering questions like "Who had the greatest contribution to their team or created the highest value to their team, rather than who was the 'best' (hitter or fielder), in terms of theoretical contribution or value to their team, which is essentially the same thing as who you would rather have on your team or who would most likely provide the greatest value to a hypothetical team or a team in the future.

Anyway, the principal reason why defensive Win Shares is not a good evaluator of defensive ability is that any defensive "metric" that does not use play by play data is necessarily not very good. I suppose it is OK to use defensive Win Shares to compare one player to another as long as one keeps in mind that the result of the comparison does not have a high degree of certainty or confidence attached to it. Sort of like comparing two players' batting averages. Although the one with the higher BA can be stated as the better of the two players if we knew nothing else about wither player, our level of certainty in that result would be low.


It sums up the way I see it as well.
__________________
Steve, Forum Administrator

POSTING TIP FOR THE DAY: When composing a post, think about what you would say if the intended recipient was an individual who was actually sitting just two feet in front of you, in person, rather than just some far away and anonymous audience who only can identify you as text on a PC screen - - and then write your post in that manner. It makes for remarkable and sincere discourse.
Wolf Hopper is offline  
Old 08-19-2003, 03:12 PM   #15
SmedIndy
NetShrine's Historian
 
SmedIndy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Zionsville, IN
Posts: 10,569
Send a message via AIM to SmedIndy
Default

But it's the best metric we have - and I'll use that before just going in cold.
SmedIndy is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Martinez returns today; Martinez could return Friday nyy26wc Around The Majors Reports 2 06-11-2003 01:59 PM
Offseason stat package--BR/9 IP nyy26wc Around The Majors Reports 5 01-12-2003 09:58 AM
Offseason stat package--H/9 IP nyy26wc Around The Majors Reports 5 01-11-2003 12:03 PM
ATM report--Milestones for Palmeiro, Martinez and Jeter nyy26wc Around The Majors Reports 2 04-20-2002 03:00 PM
Offseason stat package--H/9 IP nyy26wc Around The Majors Reports 6 01-25-2002 01:26 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Thread Contents Copyrighted In Perpetuity by NetShrine.com