NetShrine Discussion Forum  

Go Back   NetShrine Discussion Forum > NDF Archives > NDF's 3rd Year - 2003 > 2003 Hot Baseball Chatter Archives
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 07-19-2003, 09:49 AM   #1
ronh
NetShrine MVP
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Wooster, OH
Posts: 160
Default Opinion of the Indians-Rangers Trade?

I like the trade of Ryan Ludwick for Shane Spencer and Ricardo Rodriguez from a Cleveland standpoint. The Indians needed right-handed power hitters. Ludwick is a younger and hopefully better version of Spencer.

Rodriguez could be a decent pitcher but the Indians have an excess of starters.
ronh is offline  
Old 07-19-2003, 09:56 AM   #2
sweaver
Netshrine Cleanup Hitter
 
sweaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Mountain State
Posts: 8,883
Send a message via AIM to sweaver Send a message via Yahoo to sweaver
Default

I think the Indians may have given up too much. Isn't Rodriguez's star potential much greater than Ludwick's?
sweaver is offline  
Old 07-19-2003, 10:04 AM   #3
Wolf Hopper
NetShrine Creator & Curator
 
Wolf Hopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NetShrine WHQ
Posts: 6,191
Default

What exactly are the Rangers going to do with Spencer? Unless that guy with big head is officially out of their plans - - not Igor, the rookie LF from last year.
__________________
Steve, Forum Administrator

POSTING TIP FOR THE DAY: When composing a post, think about what you would say if the intended recipient was an individual who was actually sitting just two feet in front of you, in person, rather than just some far away and anonymous audience who only can identify you as text on a PC screen - - and then write your post in that manner. It makes for remarkable and sincere discourse.
Wolf Hopper is offline  
Old 07-19-2003, 11:50 AM   #4
pathogan
william Blake's Innkeeper
 
pathogan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 2,828
Default On the surface

...hart with his expierence would seem to KNOW the Cleveland system,but steve's right, what are they going to do with spenser?
pathogan is offline  
Old 07-19-2003, 12:02 PM   #5
Craig S.
Guest
 
Craig S.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 6,330
Send a message via Yahoo to Craig S.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sweaver
I think the Indians may have given up too much. Isn't Rodriguez's star potential much greater than Ludwick's?

I think the Rangers are banking on Rodriguez panning out. I can't imagine that they made the deal mainly for Spencer.
Craig S. is offline  
Old 07-19-2003, 12:13 PM   #6
LeGrandOrange
Membership Suspended 4/11/04
 
LeGrandOrange's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 3,783
Default

My opinion is that it'll be more worthwhile for both than the Hafner trade.

Indians really did give a lot more than they needed to though. Spencer isn't worth a lot so I'll ignore him. Ludwick only seemed like a potential fairly decent player while I saw Ricky Rodriguez as being potentially quite good. However, pitching is pitching and John Hart is doing well with getting some.

Ludwick probably fills a need though, and it never hurts to have a little extra speed.
LeGrandOrange is offline  
Old 07-19-2003, 12:19 PM   #7
satchel
NetShrine All-Century Team
 
satchel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 2,601
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig S.
I think the Rangers are banking on Rodriguez panning out. I can't imagine that they made the deal mainly for Spencer.
I agree - Spencer is filler; Wolf's "guy with the big head" - Kevin Mench - is younger and cheaper and might even turn out to be a better player, though he is on the DL right now.

Someone on baseball tonight last night - I can't recall who - said that back in spring training everyone in the Indians camp pegged Rodriguez as their best young pitcher. As with all trades for prospects, time will tell, but the Rangers might have made a great deal here.
__________________
Rare mold, old vomit - An anagram rejected by Tom Riddle
satchel is offline  
Old 07-19-2003, 12:21 PM   #8
sweaver
Netshrine Cleanup Hitter
 
sweaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Mountain State
Posts: 8,883
Send a message via AIM to sweaver Send a message via Yahoo to sweaver
Default

I can only assume that the evening factor is the penchant Rodriguez has shown for getting injured.
sweaver is offline  
Old 07-19-2003, 03:55 PM   #9
Wolf Hopper
NetShrine Creator & Curator
 
Wolf Hopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NetShrine WHQ
Posts: 6,191
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sweaver
I can only assume that the evening factor is the penchant Rodriguez has shown for getting injured.

Speaking of which - - since when can you trade a guy who is on the DL?
__________________
Steve, Forum Administrator

POSTING TIP FOR THE DAY: When composing a post, think about what you would say if the intended recipient was an individual who was actually sitting just two feet in front of you, in person, rather than just some far away and anonymous audience who only can identify you as text on a PC screen - - and then write your post in that manner. It makes for remarkable and sincere discourse.
Wolf Hopper is offline  
Old 07-20-2003, 09:04 AM   #10
Ytown Tribe fan
Guest
 
Ytown Tribe fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Scrappers territory
Posts: 2,515
Default

Cleveland Indians Report has a lengthy take on this that's well worth reading; the upshot being: we got rid of a hurt pitcher and acquired right-handed power and a good outfielder (who is slowed by hip injury recovery). Spencer was a throw in, maybe we could've got more for him, since he was hot lately.

Rodriguez is the wild card here. He had a fine Spring and looked like another Pedro early this year: not afraid to back guys off the plate, good command, etc. Then he had a couple of bad outings and was very uneven after that. Pretty much like ANY young pitcher. Then he got hurt and that was enough for the Tribe.

You gotta assume that Ellis won't be back, and they're going to finally dump Lawton, so Ludwick will get every chance to play. This trade could look like another steal for the Tribe in a year or two.
Ytown Tribe fan is offline  
Old 07-20-2003, 10:38 AM   #11
Wolf Hopper
NetShrine Creator & Curator
 
Wolf Hopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NetShrine WHQ
Posts: 6,191
Default

I saw Ludwick DH yesterday. I saw nothing there that was impressive. Jim Kaat said he reminded him of Dale Murphy, but, I think that was in appearance only.

Does the Tribe really need another OF/DH guy? Bradley is in CF, Gerut in RF, and they have a bunch of guys for 1B, LF, DH, no?
__________________
Steve, Forum Administrator

POSTING TIP FOR THE DAY: When composing a post, think about what you would say if the intended recipient was an individual who was actually sitting just two feet in front of you, in person, rather than just some far away and anonymous audience who only can identify you as text on a PC screen - - and then write your post in that manner. It makes for remarkable and sincere discourse.
Wolf Hopper is offline  
Old 07-20-2003, 01:21 PM   #12
sweaver
Netshrine Cleanup Hitter
 
sweaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Mountain State
Posts: 8,883
Send a message via AIM to sweaver Send a message via Yahoo to sweaver
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolf Hopper
Speaking of which - - since when can you trade a guy who is on the DL?
This seems to be a recent development, because it has happened the last couple years, but before as I recall you couldn't.

Tribe 1B/DH/LF: Broussard, Hafner, Escobar? Who else?
sweaver is offline  
Old 07-20-2003, 01:38 PM   #13
JamesI
Netshrine Vacuum Cleaner
 
JamesI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Potsdam, N.Y.
Posts: 3,723
Send a message via ICQ to JamesI Send a message via Yahoo to JamesI
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolf Hopper
Speaking of which - - since when can you trade a guy who is on the DL?

I'm pretty sure I read somewhere that players on the DL can be traded with their permission so its not just dumping an injured guy.
JamesI is offline  
Old 07-20-2003, 09:26 PM   #14
ronh
NetShrine MVP
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Wooster, OH
Posts: 160
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sweaver
Tribe 1B/DH/LF: Broussard, Hafner, Escobar? Who else?
Ludwick, Crisp, Sizemore, Lawton, Burks (maybe)
ronh is offline  
Old 07-21-2003, 05:17 PM   #15
OaktownTribeFan
Inducted Into The NetShrine Assembly of Fame
 
OaktownTribeFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The Bullpen
Posts: 529
Default

Rodriguez sure wasn't evaluated for a very long period of time before the trade was made. It's a hasty move. Ludwick has been rated by Sickels as, at best, a B prospect. So Shapiro gives up not one, but two players for him? Right now, I don't like the trade, but we'll see how it pans out.
OaktownTribeFan is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rockies-Diamondbacks trade nyy26wc Around The Majors Reports 1 11-20-2002 02:31 PM
Diamondbacks-Cubs trade; Alou hired; Rockies-Marlins trade update nyy26wc Around The Majors Reports 6 11-19-2002 12:19 PM
ATM report--Major victory for the Rangers, a setback for the Dodgers nyy26wc Around The Majors Reports 2 04-21-2002 01:11 PM
Mets and Rangers -- Possible Trade? b-ball-lunachik 2002 Hot Baseball Chatter Archives 9 03-21-2002 07:54 PM
Rangers Trade Pena to As, Get Pitchers Duque 2002 Hot Baseball Chatter Archives 13 01-14-2002 03:07 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Thread Contents Copyrighted In Perpetuity by NetShrine.com