View Full Version : Those Mighty M's
06-06-2001, 01:45 PM
As of this AM, Seattle is 45 and 12. An incredible winning % of just about .790.
If they play basically .500 ball the rest of the way, they win 100 games.
But, to break the all-time mark for wins in a season, they would need to play .680 ball the rest of the way (105 games). That's better than 2 of every 3.
Can they do it?
06-06-2001, 02:07 PM
Showed no reasons why they can't.
06-06-2001, 02:31 PM
Actually, they should go for it this year.
Boone and Sele are Free Agents in 2002.
Edgar will be a year older. The league will have better scouting in Iricho.............
Thought - say they go 116 and whatever. More pressure to win in the post-season?
06-07-2001, 03:17 AM
:) I'm not normally a negative person but lets put an *
next to 116 wins or more. Remember unbalanced schedual, high strike zone (or is it wider I'm not sure:))
could be the camera angles, NOT, Records are made to be broken, but.....
06-07-2001, 06:17 AM
Originally posted by bagger015
put an * next to 116 wins or more. Remember unbalanced schedule
Never happen bagger. Didn't in '98 when the Yanks set the AL mark - - remember, they had inter-league play which the old holder (Indians) did not...........
06-07-2001, 07:03 AM
Originally posted by NetShrine
Never happen baggerNor does it deserve an asterisk.
06-07-2001, 10:36 PM
Originally posted by BuzzBuzzard
Nor does it deserve an asterisk.
I know it doesn't just making a point besides the one at the top of my head.:D
vBulletin v3.5.4, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.