PDA

View Full Version : 1983 Baseball Abstract


sweaver
05-09-2003, 12:34 PM
Sporting a cover blurb of effusive praise from Roger Angell, the second mass-produced version of the Baseball Abstract from Bill James hit the stands in the spring of 1983. James provides a list of readers of the original version of the Abstract in the Acknowledgements, and they are an interesting cross-section of the famous and the obscure. There is also a cut-out blank to send in for a proposed newsletter, which James would produce for a number of years.

The introduction, as usual, dives right into the good stuff, and leads into the Methods section, describing the tools like Runs Created, Range Factor, and the Pythagorean Formula. The New Business section of Methods includes Account-Form box scores, Ballpark Effects, the Log5 Method, and a more complicated formula for Runs Created, among others.

James then dives into the teams, with an essay and stats on each club. In the Cardinals section, he examines how Whitey Herzog adjusted the rotation to keep Andjuar pitching on 3 days rest, with Bob Forsch on 4 days, and the rest working around them, while most teams just went straight 5-man. He also examines the Phillies' leadoff problems, the Expos black hole at 2B, power pitchers in Shea, Joe Torre as manager of the Braves (a cool read in retrospect), 4-man vs. 5-man rotations, Dick Williams and lefty pitchers, the Reds' tremendous (and destructive) roster turnover, bullpen effects, Gene Mauch's strategies, the underachieving Tigers, Gabe Paul, and more. Each ballpark also get a box concerning its tendencies.

The player ranking section follows, with brief comments about each. Longer comments concern Ted Simmons, Steve Garvey, Pete Rose, Joe Morgan, Mike Schmidt, Cal Ripken, MVP Robin Yount, Ozzie Smith, Bruce Bochte, and Gaylord Perry, among others. There is also a study using The Favorite Toy of career projections, Power-Speed Number, the Law of Competitive Balance, and an essay reprinted from the 1980 Abstract titled "What Does it Take?" on Hall of Fame standards.

As with all the Abstracts, there's a lot there.

rcartman28
05-09-2003, 12:59 PM
This one was the first Bill James publication I ever read (and still have at home), although I haven't read in quite a while. What I remember most was Bill talking about how Milwaukee probably would have had about the same record even if Rollie Fingers hadn't pitched all year for them instead of only being out for the final month of the season.

The book was my introduction into the wonderful world of sabermetrics.

I still have some of those newsletters he wrote somewhere at home, too.....

GGC
05-09-2003, 10:56 PM
sweaver, which one of the annual Abstracts is your favorite and why?

To me, it was the 1986 one. I think that it was the first one I bought and I think that it was the one that Bill wrote while he was at his peak. He had some of his most relevant work here (MLE's, for one) and he wasn't burnt out yet.

GGC

GGC
05-10-2003, 12:29 AM
Moneyball has a chapter on Bill James. It mentions some of his early fans including Norman Mailer and "the guy who played Squiggy on Laverne and Shirley ." No mention of Angell. From what I understand (thanks to a Rob Neyer post on another forum,) publishing industry SOP is to write these quotes and then get someone famous to agree to have their name next to it. This isn't the case all the time, but it happens frequently enough.

GGC

sweaver
05-10-2003, 01:00 AM
Angell is mentioned by James in the 1983 book as one of the early readers of the Abstract. I would bet that Angell wrote the blurb himself.

I'll get to that question of my own favorite as I go through the books. ;)

GGC
05-10-2003, 01:12 AM
I was getting ready to go to bed after I visited here. Before I did, I picked up my copy of the '83 Abstract and noticed that Angell was mentioned. I guess I stuck my keyboard in my mouth :(. Not the first time, and probably not the last either.

GGC

pathogan
05-10-2003, 09:23 AM
...Norman Mailer praise it,or saying something like he sent James a check, and james returned it, then Mailer sent it back saying you've earned it...I dont think this is apocraphyl...