Let
The Big Train Rumble
by
Tim Connelly
There are many ways of
looking at the greatness of a pitcher’s season. What I wanted to do in this
article was to spend a little time evaluating the very best way of looking at a
pitcher while determining which pitcher had the greatest season ever.
I am going to start from a small list of great seasons and expand the search
from there:
In 1968, Bob Gibson had the lowest ERA of any pitcher in this century who threw at least 300 innings. Anytime you accomplish something beyond what anybody else has done, you’ve done good. But the question becomes, how great an accomplishment is Gibson’s feat? Here is a list of the top 15 all time with at least 300 innings.
|
ERA |
|
|
YEAR |
ERA |
IP |
|
1 |
Bob |
Gibson |
1968 |
1.12 |
305 |
|
2 |
Walter |
Johnson |
1913 |
1.14 |
346 |
|
3 |
Addie |
Joss |
1908 |
1.16 |
325 |
|
4 |
Grover |
Alexander |
1915 |
1.22 |
376 |
|
5 |
George |
Bradley |
1876 |
1.23 |
573 |
|
6 |
Ed |
Walsh |
1910 |
1.27 |
369.2 |
|
7 |
Walter |
Johnson |
1918 |
1.27 |
326 |
|
8 |
Christy |
Mathewson |
1905 |
1.28 |
338.2 |
|
9 |
Jack |
Coombs |
1910 |
1.3 |
353 |
|
10 |
Three Finger |
Brown |
1909 |
1.31 |
342.2 |
|
11 |
Jack |
Taylor |
1902 |
1.33 |
324.2 |
|
12 |
Walter |
Johnson |
1910 |
1.36 |
370 |
|
13 |
Old Hoss |
Radbourn |
1884 |
1.38 |
678.2 |
|
14 |
Walter |
Johnson |
1912 |
1.39 |
369 |
|
15 |
Ed |
Walsh |
1908 |
1.42 |
464 |
Gibson threw 13 shutouts that season. He completed 28 out of 34 games. He set a
World Series record. that still stands today: 17 strikeouts in a game.
Gibson’s year was beyond fantastic.
It can be argued that his record was only 22-9. But we’re going to step around
that and say that runs were at an all-time low. He pitched in a pitchers park in
a pitchers era. That had to help.
But when looking at his ERA against the league average, it is still the best
ever of any pitcher throwing at least 250 innings.
|
ERA |
|
|
YEAR |
RATE |
PLAYER |
LEAGUE |
|
1 |
Bob |
Gibson |
1968 |
266 |
1.12 |
2.98 |
|
2 |
Walter |
Johnson |
1913 |
256 |
1.14 |
2.92 |
|
3 |
Three Finger |
Brown |
1906 |
253 |
1.04 |
2.63 |
|
4 |
Walter |
Johnson |
1912 |
240 |
1.39 |
3.34 |
|
5 |
Dwight |
Gooden |
1985 |
235 |
1.53 |
3.60 |
|
6 |
Christy |
Mathewson |
1905 |
235 |
1.28 |
2.99 |
|
7 |
Christy |
Mathewson |
1909 |
226 |
1.14 |
2.59 |
|
8 |
Cy |
Young |
1901 |
225 |
1.62 |
3.66 |
|
9 |
Grover |
Alexander |
1915 |
225 |
1.22 |
2.74 |
|
10 |
Roger |
Clemens |
1997 |
224 |
2.05 |
4.57 |
|
11 |
Dean |
Chance |
1964 |
220 |
1.65 |
3.63 |
|
12 |
Walter |
Johnson |
1918 |
218 |
1.27 |
2.77 |
|
13 |
Ron |
Guidry |
1978 |
217 |
1.74 |
3.78 |
|
14 |
Walter |
Johnson |
1919 |
217 |
1.49 |
3.22 |
|
15 |
Old Hoss |
Radbourn |
1884 |
216 |
1.38 |
2.98 |
We know that 1968 was the “Year of the Pitcher” so the tendency is to lower
our evaluation of Gibson based on that. But actually there have been more than
25 seasons just since 1900 where the league ERA was lower than the National
League ERA of 2.99 that season. And it wasn’t like there were lots of other
pitchers with terribly a low ERA, the second lowest mark in the league was by
Bobby Bolin who had an ERA of 1.99. Terrific yes, but still 87 points behind
Gibson.
So we’re going to move from Gibson aware that the conditions helped but also
aware that this is not some kind of a meaningless statistical illusion.
The greatness of Lefty Grove’s 1931 season would seem to rest on his winning
31 games with only 4 losses. Actually Denny McLain won the same number of games,
while pitching many more innings with a slightly lower ERA in 1968. McLain lost
2 extra games but that’s not really what separates the 2 seasons. Grove had a
2.06 ERA when the league was at 4.38. So the real greatness of Grove’s season
rests on the combination of a great record and a great ERA, once it is placed in
perspective.
The job of a pitcher is not only to prevent the other team from scoring: It is
also to manage his allowance of runs in such a way as to bring victory to his
team as often as possible. Nobody has ever done that quite as well as he did
during a season where they won that many games. But pitchers do not start from
an even base. The Athletics were a great team even when Grove was not pitching.
There record was 76 and 41 in the decisions Grove was not involved in. That’s
a winning percentage of .650. Grove’s winning percentage was .886!
Still, all things considered, I would rank Grove’s season below Gibson’s.
Steve Carlton won 27 and lost 10 in 1972. That’s an excellent record but it's
not that special. Note the pitcher we just talked about.
But Steve pitched for a miserable team. The Phillies won only 32 games when
Carlton wasn’t on the mound! The team was an unbelievable 32 and 87 in the
decisions he was not a part of. That's a winning percentage of .269. That's
within a stone's throw of being at the bottom for any modern team: The NY Mets
of 1962 had a winning percentage of .250.
The Phillies finished next to last in runs scored and were better at pitching
than at hitting. I mention that to show he wasn’t a great pitcher playing for
a lousy pitching team that gave good offensive support. At least if they did
give him good offensive support, it was a matter of some luck: This was a lousy
hitting ball club.
I give Carlton a lot of credit. To be able to win on a team as lousy as the
Phillies were is a heck of an accomplishment. But I would have to say that
“wins above team,” while a very interesting stat, is not the final word.
Carlton was pitching far away from the pressures of a pennant race. Even though
he pitched some great baseball, the fact that every game he pitched after the
all-star game had no bearing on his team even getting out of last place, makes
me feel like it could never be rated as the greatest season ever. He also led
the league in ERA with a very nice 1.97 but his ERA was only the league's best
by 2 points. This was a great, great season and I won't quarrel with anybody who
rates his accomplishment a little higher than I do.
Walter Johnson’s 1913 season has to get my vote for the best season ever. I
think the key to being a strong student of the game is to be open to looking at
everything. So rather than looking at one thing, I’m trying to focus my vision
on the bigger picture. Johnson’s ERA is within a couple of points Of
Gibson’s. In fact many old writings refer to his ERA as 1.09. And his record
is comparable to Grove’s. He was either 34 and 7 or 36 and 7. Different
encyclopedias list his win total differently. With his ERA on the same block as
Gibson’s and a winning percentage pretty close to Grove’s, it looks like The
Big Train is the big man!
Here is a list of the top 15 pitchers in winning percentage with at least 27
wins:
|
W% |
|
|
YEAR |
PCT |
W |
|
1 |
Lefty |
Grove |
1931 |
0.886 |
31 |
|
2 |
Joe |
Wood |
1912 |
0.872 |
34 |
|
3 |
Lefty |
Grove |
1930 |
0.848 |
28 |
|
T4 |
Denny |
McLain |
1968 |
0.838 |
31 |
|
T4 |
Bill |
Hoffer |
1895 |
0.838 |
31 |
|
6 |
Walter |
Johnson |
1913 |
0.837 |
36 |
|
7 |
Old Hoss |
Radbourn |
1884 |
0.831 |
59 |
|
T8 |
Jim |
Hughes |
1899 |
0.824 |
28 |
|
T8 |
Jack |
Chesbro |
1902 |
0.824 |
28 |
|
T8 |
Dazzy |
Vance |
1924 |
0.824 |
28 |
|
11 |
Bob |
Welch |
1990 |
0.818 |
27 |
|
12 |
Joe |
McGinnity |
1904 |
0.814 |
35 |
|
13 |
Dizzy |
Dean |
1934 |
0.811 |
30 |
|
14 |
Eddie |
Cicotte |
1919 |
0.806 |
29 |
|
T15 |
Robin |
Roberts |
1952 |
0.800 |
28 |
|
T15 |
Mickey |
Welch |
1885 |
0.800 |
44 |